CNN is reporting about Paul Verhoeven and his “Jesus Seminar.”

Director’s book disputes birth of Jesus
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) — Film director Paul Verhoeven has written a book that contradicts the Bible by suggesting that Jesus might have been fathered by a Roman soldier who raped Mary.

An Amsterdam publishing house said Wednesday it would publish the Dutch filmmaker’s biography of Jesus, “Jesus of Nazareth: A Realistic Portrait” in September.

I find the word “realistic” an interesting one to use.

Verhoeven is best known as the director of blockbuster films including “Basic Instinct” and “RoboCop,” but he is also a member of “Jesus Seminar,” a group of scholars and authors that seeks to establish historical facts about Jesus.

Marianna Sterk of the publishing house J.M. Meulenhoff said the book included several ideas that ran contrary to Christian faith, including the suggestion that Jesus could be the son of a Roman soldier who raped Mary during a Jewish uprising against Roman rule in 4 B.C.

The book also claims that Judas Iscariot was not responsible for Jesus’ betrayal, she said.

The movie director’s claims were greeted with some skepticism among those who have dedicated their careers to studying the life of Jesus.

One issue is that there is very little information about the life of Jesus outside of the Gospels. The Gospels as understood by Christians for nearly 2,000 years do not support Verhoeven’s ideas.

William Portier, a professor of religious studies at the University of Dayton, in Ohio, said the Jesus Seminar was known for making provocative claims, but “they are real scholars — you have to deal with them.”

However, he said Verhoeven’s ideas sounded “pretty out there.”

So even people who have spent their lives studying the life of Jesus consider Verhoeven’s ideas “pretty out there.” Doesn’t bode well for him, does it?

John Dominic Crossan, a Jesus Seminar founder, agreed. He said that while Verhoeven was a member in good standing, there was little evidence for the view that Jesus was illegitimate.

Crossan said the claim was first reported in a polemic written in the second century against the Book of Matthew, intended for a Jewish audience.

“It’s an obvious first retort to claims that Mary was a virgin,” Crossan said. “If you wanted to do a hatchet job on Jesus’ reputation, this would be the way.”

The most likely scenario for people who don’t accept that Jesus was literally the son of God and had no human father is simply that he was the son of Joseph, Crossan said.

Sterk said the book would be translated into English in 2009. Verhoeven hopes it will be a springboard for him to raise interest in making a film along the same lines, she said.

Verhoeven, 69, has dreamed of making a movie about Jesus’ life for decades, she said.

Asked whether it would be difficult to follow Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” and Martin Scorsese’s “The Last Temptation of Christ,” she said Verhoeven knew he might be somewhat late to market.

“He is painfully aware of that,” she said. “However, he has quite a different angle.”

What we have here is a guy who is desperately trying to make money by creating controversy. His claims are so outrageous and self-serving that they get attention. He’s 69 years old - a turning point age - and he’s dreamed of making a movie about the life of Jesus for many years. He’s desperate, and this is the only way he can get the attention he seeks and make his dream of a movie about Jesus a possibility. And he admits that he hopes his book will be “a springboard” to raising enough money to make the movie.

There’s no surprise then. It all comes down to money - and attention (i.e. fame).

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 24th, 2008 at 5:56 am and is filed under Headlines/Current Events, Religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.