I find it amusing that so many Democrats are comparing Obama to Sarah Palin. John McCain is a healthy and active man, and his mother is alive and active well into her nineties. Yet, to hear the Democrats talk, you’d think John McCain is slated to keel over dead within 24 hours of becoming President in January. However, even if that were to happen, Sarah Palin would be a much better, more effective, and certainly a more ethical POTUS than either Obama or Biden.
I am voting for John McCain - Sarah Palin for many reasons. The main one is that they are both ethical people who have demonstrated their honor and strength of character not only in their words but in their actions and their relationships. If Barack Obama had exactly the same beliefs he has right now and said exactly what he says right now, and the only thing different about him was that he had an “R” after his name instead of a “D”, he would be sounded denounced and outcast by the Democrats for his long-term associations with Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko - to just name a few. Being willingly blind is what being a Democrat is all about this election cycle.
I actually laugh now when I read yet another Democrat talking about John McCain dumping his sick wife and marrying his multimillionaire mistress. Uhhh - yes, that was over 28 years ago and he has accepted full responsibility for his bad behavior - and he and his first wife, Carol, have a good relationship now - they have all along. He and Cindy have now been married for 28 years. That’s a long-term marriage, folks. And, dems act like something is wrong with Cindy because she’s a multimillionaire. Her parents started off with nothing. They put everything they had into a business and were able to prosper. They lived the American dream - and now that’s supposed to be something bad?
So, the Democrats are acting all offended and outraged over some of the McCain ads. The truth hurts, apparently, and sputtering outrage is the best they can come up with. So here is McCain’s response to some of the Democratic mud-slinging of late.
Sphere: Related ContentIn recent days, Barack Obama has decided to engage Senator McCain and Governor Sarah Palin in a debate over earmarks. However, despite his attempts to call everyone who examines his record a liar, the facts are clear:
While Senator McCain has never requested a single earmark, Senator Obama has requested nearly a billion dollars worth during his short time in office. Though Senator Biden has been in the Senate for 36 years, he has only disclosed his earmarks for one year.
Senator Obama increased his earmark requests during each of his first three years in office. Governor Palin has cut requests for earmarks for Alaska by $150 million since entering office, and she has cut those requests every single year. She has also vetoed a half billion dollars in wasteful spending at the state level.
Senator Obama has also attacked Governor Palin over the “Bridge to Nowhere.” despite the fact that he actually voted for the bridge, and his own party in Alaska credited her for ending the project. The fact is the bridge ballooned in cost between the time it was first budgeted and when Palin became governor. Once in the Governor’s office, Palin examined the new facts and concluded that the project had become too expensive and a poor use of tax dollars. This conclusion led to her decision to end the project, as detailed in numerous press accounts at the time.
Sex Education: When confronted with questions about his support for K through 12 sex education, Barack Obama has lashed out at the propriety of any questions on what he voted for. The text of the bill in question reads:
“Each class or course in comprehensive sex education offered in any of grades K through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV.”
The fact is that this legislation stated expressly that children in grades kindergarten through 12 were to be taught about sexually transmitted diseases. If Senator Obama believes that it is not appropriate to teach kindergarteners about sexually transmitted diseases, he should have joined with the minority who voted against the bill. Instead, he supported it.While Senator Obama has tried to assert that all he’s ever been concerned about was protecting young children from predators, the facts tell a different story. For example, in describing his position on sex ed for kindergarteners in 2004, Obama specifically said it included topics other than sex predators or inappropriate touching, saying, “If they ask a teacher ‘where do babies come from,’ that providing information that the fact is that it’s not a stork is probably not an unhealthy thing.”
In 2007, Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood that he supported “age-appropriate” sex education for kindergarteners. When challenged about what was “age-appropriate,” the Obama campaign cited guidelines that included comprehensive and explicit teaching that should concern every parent.
Taxes: The Obama campaign claims that anyone who says that Senator Obama is going to raise taxes is lying. But the fact is that what Senator Obama says and what he has voted for are two different things.
He pledges on the campaign trail that he wouldn’t raise taxes on the middle class, but in the Senate, he voted for higher taxes on people making just $42,000 per year. He has voted for higher taxes or against tax cuts 94 times. It is not a lie to point out this record of votes. At the beginning of the campaign, he promised to raise taxes on every American with an investment through his increases on capital gains and dividend taxes.
Over the course of this campaign, he has run away from this record of supporting higher taxes. That is not surprising in an election year, but that is also why the record is important. Senator Obama has put forth so many versions of his tax plan, voters are naturally going to judge him not just on what he says on the campaign trail, but what he has done during his time in office.





















January 1st, 1970 at 12:00 am
September 23rd, 2008 at 6:23 am
I find your commenmts disgusting. Apparently your talking points are taken straight out of the MCINSANE camp. So you think this country needs 4 more years of bushbrain criminal policies that have the whole world wondering how dumb and delusional can these people be. You seem to be confused with empty words and the blathering lies and of Mcinsane.
September 24th, 2008 at 4:44 am
To Greg: Your comment is funny. It is typical, apparently, that liberals can’t discuss anything without resorting to name-calling and personal attacks. (i.e. “disgusting,” “MCINSANE,” “dumb and delusional,” “bushbrain criminal”). Your comment illustrates just how immature your thinking is.
September 24th, 2008 at 4:47 am
Oh yes, Greg. The points in the above post ARE taken straight from MCCAIN’s webpage - as noted in the post.